Can School Districts Bounce Back from Large Pandemic-Era Chronic Absenteeism Increases?

July 2026

The pandemic affected all communities, leading to sharp increases in chronic absenteeism in most school districts. Across the nation, chronic absenteeism rates nearly doubled between the 2018-2019 and 2021-22 school years. Significant increases occurred in urban and rural areas, in both low-income and affluent communities, in districts with historically high rates of chronic absenteeism, and in districts where few students had been chronically absent before the pandemic. As a result, reducing chronic absenteeism has become a major priority for most school districts.

This new analysis from researchers at the Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University identifies how many districts experienced substantial pandemic-era increases in chronic absenteeism, which types of districts were most affected, and how many returned to close to pre-pandemic levels by the 2023–2024 or 2024–2025 school years.

The report pays special attention to districts nationwide that had at least a 10 percentage point increase in chronic absenteeism from pre- to post-pandemic. Districts that were able to decrease their chronic absenteeism rate to within two percentage points of their pre-pandemic level by 2024-25 or 2023-24 were considered to have “bounced back.”

Key findings include:

  • Bouncing back is possible. Districts of all sizes and locales have been able to bounce back to near pre-pandemic levels of chronic absenteeism.
  • Bouncing back is not yet common. By the 2024-25 school year, only 11% of school districts that experienced significant post-pandemic chronic absenteeism increases had returned to chronic absenteeism levels close to pre-pandemic. 
  • While bouncing back took place in many different kinds of districts, it was most common in small and rural districts. 20% of small and rural districts bounced back by 2024-25 (compared to 100% of all districts). The small and rural districts that bounced back were largely concentrated in particular states, suggesting that state actions may have played a role in districts’ ability to bounce back.
Share to your network
Skip to content